The Armond White Thread

A subforum to discuss film culture and criticism.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Fiery Angel
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:59 pm

Re: Bob Dylan

#1401 Post by Fiery Angel » Tue Jul 28, 2020 2:23 pm


User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1402 Post by Brian C » Tue Jul 28, 2020 2:44 pm

Not that White is the only one that’s done this, but it’s a real sign of the times that the media as a whole has decided to unquestioningly regurgitate the misleading marketing claim that Dylan just got his first #1 single. It’s true the song hit #1 ... but on the “US Rock Digital Song Sales” chart.

User avatar
Fiery Angel
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:59 pm

Re: Bob Dylan

#1403 Post by Fiery Angel » Mon Dec 14, 2020 7:08 pm


User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1404 Post by Brian C » Mon Dec 14, 2020 9:17 pm

Haven’t seen the film but I didn’t make it past White’s second paragraph, where he grinds his axe against a bunch of irrelevant pop-culture figures while deliberately conflating “the media” and “millennials” ... all while calling other people hacks.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1405 Post by Big Ben » Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:13 pm

I honestly can't tell if his conflation of Far Right Fascism with left wing politics (Notably Upton Sinclair) is sincere or not. But then again he appears to be more concerned with throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks so perhaps I'm giving White more credit than he deserves when it comes to political self awareness.

User avatar
Reverend Drewcifer
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 5:16 pm
Location: Cincinnati

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1406 Post by Reverend Drewcifer » Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:23 pm

The Social Network is a "hagiography." Who knew?

User avatar
TheKieslowskiHaze
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:37 am

Re: Bob Dylan

#1407 Post by TheKieslowskiHaze » Mon Dec 14, 2020 11:32 pm

Fiery Angel wrote:
Mon Dec 14, 2020 7:08 pm
He unsurprisingly hates Mank
In a disparaging tweet about it, did he tag the wrong David Fincher?

(click here if you don't get the reference)

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1408 Post by domino harvey » Thu Dec 08, 2022 12:22 am

I bet you can guess how much he loves the Sight and Sound poll - actual LOLs at him referring to Daisies only as "Vera Chitilová’s obscure Czech feminist screed"

...but God help us, many of the films he proposes as "better than" are, for once, actually better than

User avatar
furbicide
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 4:52 am

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1409 Post by furbicide » Thu Dec 08, 2022 1:59 am

I feel like AW is a much more interesting critic for what he does like than the seemingly much longer list of what he doesn't (which tends to be tiresomely predictable, as is the case again here).

I also think the reference to Akerman's suicide as some kind of evidence of her anhedonia is a pretty low dig, even for him. It's clear he either never saw or is deciding to ignore films like Golden Eighties, A Couch in New York and Tomorrow We Move, or any of her more comedic shorts like Saute ma ville, Family Business, Sloth or Le déménagement (the last of those is particularly wonderful; I was just watching it again the other day and adored every minute of it). Even if one sees Jeanne Dielman as a dour film – and I wouldn't necessarily go to the mat to argue it isn't – there was plenty of life and buoyancy running through her work. I guess it's convenient for White's diatribe to overlook that, and he knows full well that his readership isn't going to know any better.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1410 Post by swo17 » Thu Dec 08, 2022 2:09 am

His alternative shorts list is pretty good (though the two that actually made the list are great to begin with--but what do I know, I'm just an avant-garde elitist!)

Not a great look though to replace all the women-directed films with films by men about "exploring the gender experience." Could he really not think of any women directors that fall outside of the political zeitgeist he's critiquing? Same question for non-white directors

User avatar
colinr0380
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1411 Post by colinr0380 » Thu Dec 08, 2022 2:30 am

Sounds like he's proposing making his own poll, with blackjack and hookers.

I do also agree with furbicide about the bringing up the suicide as if it proves his point. If anything, since it occurred in the wake of the death of her mother (and soon after the No Home Movie documentary she made about her mother's day to day life in her apartment, which kind of bookends her career with Jeanne Dielman), it perhaps more suggests just how connected Akerman was with that maternal figure, and perhaps could not exist in a world without that presence.
Last edited by colinr0380 on Thu Dec 08, 2022 2:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
brundlefly
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 12:55 pm

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1412 Post by brundlefly » Thu Dec 08, 2022 2:37 am

He didn't attack Sciamma, maybe because he couldn't decide whether she was "abounding" or "defying." She's white, so she's not qualified to "infiltrate."

So sad so much of his thinking has devolved to schtik, and so many of his wokeness rants boil down to, "Hey no fair I'M the provocateur! [drops pants]"

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1413 Post by tenia » Thu Dec 08, 2022 4:03 am

swo17 wrote:
Thu Dec 08, 2022 2:09 am
Not a great look though to replace all the women-directed films with films by men about "exploring the gender experience." Could he really not think of any women directors that fall outside of the political zeitgeist he's critiquing? Same question for non-white directors.
I don't believe he thinks anything about this, but is just assuming by default that these movies are worse than supposedly-better white-male-directed movies because that's his whole point : a few women-directed movies, a few non-white movies, 2 short movies, that's already too much, these movies can't be that liked for regular reasons, because these aren't regular movies : these are subcategories that can only be that mentioned for sociopolitical movies, not because they're considered to have the same qualities than white-male-directed ones.

Which, to put it bluntly, simply is racist and sexist, ie discriminating works solely based on the gender or the ethnicity of those credited for them. Who would have guessed.

It's also interesting to note that 12 of his 17 sound-movies alternatives are US English-speaking movies. Ethnocentrism : a definition.

wattsup32
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:00 pm

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1414 Post by wattsup32 » Thu Dec 08, 2022 10:55 pm

furbicide wrote:
Thu Dec 08, 2022 1:59 am
I feel like AW is a much more interesting critic for what he does like than the seemingly much longer list of what he doesn't (which tends to be tiresomely predictable, as is the case again here).
This has always been my feeling about him and I have encountered some terrific films (Chameleon Street comes to mind) by seeking out the films he loves. For whatever else he does to try to drag the world down, he adds value if you figure out what of his schtick to ignore. Luckily, he makes identifying what to ignore fairly obvious.

rrenault
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1415 Post by rrenault » Sun Dec 11, 2022 12:16 pm

I feel like there'd be a point in there somewhere in all of his hectoring and polemics if he didn't insist on always throwing the baby out with the bathwater.


User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1417 Post by tenia » Sat Feb 25, 2023 6:05 pm

Mississippi Mermaid vs Avatar 2, I mean : thanks captain Obvious !

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1418 Post by swo17 » Sat Feb 25, 2023 7:10 pm

Wait, he even bags on the new Spielberg? I like how he eventually gives up on the one-to-one comparisons and just says that the last film bests "all of this year’s Oscar-nominated junk"

User avatar
Fiery Angel
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:59 pm

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1419 Post by Fiery Angel » Sat Feb 25, 2023 8:02 pm

he's been bagging on Spielberg for awhile now, at least since "Lincoln"

User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1420 Post by Brian C » Sat Feb 25, 2023 9:22 pm

White seems to be getting lazier - the connections he makes between films in his Better-Than lists are already usually pretty tenuous, but here they're just straight up non-sequiturs. "The Bride Wore Black is great! It surpasses [spins wheel] ... The Banshees of Inisherin." He could have put any other movie in place of Banshees and it would make no difference at all - he doesn't bother to come up with even a superficial link between the two.

Same with The Wild Child - it's "richer than Everything Everywhere All at Once," full stop. Neat!

Sadly, his thesaurus let him down by the end. The Bride Wore Black "surpasses". Mississippi Mermaid "transcends". The Story of Adele H. "supersedes". But by the time we get to The Green Room, he has to make do with saying it "bests". Lame.

User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1421 Post by Lemmy Caution » Sun Feb 26, 2023 4:31 am

He was saving obliterates...

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1422 Post by tenia » Sun Feb 26, 2023 6:57 am

Brian C wrote:
Sat Feb 25, 2023 9:22 pm
Same with The Wild Child - it's "richer than Everything Everywhere All at Once," full stop.
I've never seen The Wild Child but have seen EEAAO : is the Truffaut a family story setup against a multiverse adventures background ?

User avatar
furbicide
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 4:52 am

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1423 Post by furbicide » Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:26 am

I think Armond might have gotten that one mixed up with the Truffaut film The Man Who Loved Every Woman Everywhere All at Once.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1424 Post by Big Ben » Fri Jul 21, 2023 1:21 pm

Armond's review of Barbie for National Review is something else.
Armond White wrote:Barbie opens with a riff on 2001: A Space Odyssey where sullen little girls smash old-fashioned baby dolls (i.e., the idea of motherhood). Non-maternal Barbie (Robbie) towers over these fitful tykes, shadowing them like Kubrick’s black slab and inspiring violent resistance. Doll babies are tossed in the air, then fall into Barbieland, because the idea of women’s liberation has been weaponized.
Armond White wrote:Yet Gerwig’s artifice defies the special feeling that females might know — the fulfilling, personal escape into free femininity, childbearing, family, homemaking, and romance that should be the essence of a Barbie movie. She ignores the childhood fantasy in which kids dream of being wives, moms, teachers, nurses, etc. — roles essential to the world.
Armond White wrote:Fact is, tough-blonde Robbie lacks slim, doll-like fragility.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Armond White Thread

#1425 Post by domino harvey » Fri Jul 21, 2023 1:49 pm

Did he just call Margot Robbie fat?

Post Reply