D.W. Griffith

[The Elegant Dandy Fop]

Am I wrong in remembering that part of the controversy of this specific book is about how poorly researched and inaccurate multiple aspects of the book are?

[DarkImbecile]

That’s the impression I’m getting: it’s very pointedly non-academic, and very casual in making assertions that sound a bit questionable — even if the basic thrust of the thesis is generally accurate